Today's Buzz:

Monday, June 12, 2006

Shame on you, Washington Post

In an editorial today in one of this country's greatest newspapers, The Washington Post, the editors repeated the false statement that healthy competition exists in the market for consumer broadband services. In the editorial, entitled "The Internet's Future: Congress should stay out of cyberspace" the editors write:
The advocates of neutrality suggest, absurdly, that a non-neutral Internet would resemble cable TV: a medium through which only corporate content is delivered. This analogy misses the fact that the market for Internet connections, unlike that for cable television, is competitive: More than 60 percent of Zip codes in the United States are served by four or more broadband providers that compete to give consumers what they want -- fast access to the full range of Web sites, including those of their kids' soccer league, their cousins' photos, MoveOn.org and the Christian Coalition. If one broadband provider slowed access to fringe bloggers, the blogosphere would rise up in protest -- and the provider would lose customers.
But this is entirely incorrect and misleading. There are just two pipes into the majority of consumer's homes -- a telephone wire and a cable TV wire. Every broadband provider in the country must connect to the consumer over one of those two wires. The only third party access deals that exist were created as partnerships with telephone companies back when there was an FCC enforcing access regulations. Those regulations are gone. Phone companies now have no obligation to allow other providers to offer service to consumers and as those agreements end, they will not be renewed. So there are at best TWO providers.

However, the situation is getting worse as we begin to look at "broadband" as 14 mbps or 40 mbps instead of 1.5 (or less) -- as we "need" and "want" real broadband speeds, fiber to the home will be the only wire capable of providing this speed. Then we will be reduced to a single option, the phone company.

Write to the Washington Post and let them know what you think: letters@washpost.com

posted by Ted Shelton at 4:32 PM

1 Comments:

Blogger Kaps said...

And, don't forget that in the "60 percent of Zip codes" tally, there only needs to be one house in the Zip code receiving the broadband for the entire Zip code to count.
See http://www.freepress.net/docs/broadband_report.pdf for more illumination than the Post has.

10:04 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

The news, what the pundits said, and selections from bloggers...

A complete roundup of news and current events on VoIP, Wi-Fi, WiMAX, mobile telephony and computing, and advanced IP applications.

Syndication via FeedBurner



IP Inferno is sponsored by:
Lok Technology, Inc.

VoIP Magazine Home Page

IP Inferno is written by:
Dan Brekke
Ted Shelton
Sean Wolfe

Press inquiries: press@ipinferno.com

Previous Posts

  • Astroturf Commenting
  • My Suspicion Grows
  • Just because you're paranoid...
  • Net Neutrality is the Wrong Frame
  • Press Releases Aren't the only Problem
  • Wired: Why We Published the AT&T Docs
  • Who Funds "Hands off the Internet" ?
  • Lack Of Mobile DRM To (Generate) 3.5B Euros
  • Comparative broadband ideas
  • Vonage gets squeezed from above-Verizon- and below...

Powered by Blogger

Where We Find the News

Sources are in the order referenced, most recent listed first
SF Gate
Broadcasting & Cable
Andy Abramson
NetworkingPipeline
The Register
Computerworld
Wireless Unleashed
Jeff Pulver
eWeek
CNet News.com
Internet News
TheStreet.com
NewsFactor
Om Malik
Wi-Fi Planet
Reuters
Brian Kane
Greg Galitzine
Wi-Fi Networking News
Rochester Democrat and Chronicle
TMC Net
SF Gate
UPI
Paul Victor Novarese
William Hungerfold
Baltimore Sun
CRM Buyer
Seattle Times
Dan Gillmor
Glenn Fleishman
Dana Blankenhorn
David Isenberg

Other sources
Doc Searls
Ted Shelton
All Headline News
Technorati
North American Bandwidth News

 

Afterink Publishing Network
* * * IP Inferno * * *